Absorb and conquer: An EU approach to Russian and Chinese integration in Eurasia

Author (Person)
Publication Date June 2016
ISBN 978-1-910118-74-0
Content Type

Europe shouldn’t be afraid of Russian and Chinese efforts to integrate the Eurasian landmass, but should embrace these initiatives and absorb them into its international order, making use of its huge market, soft power, and long experience of regional integration.

Moscow’s “Eurasian Economic Union” aims to create a Russian-dominated bloc to rival the EU, while Beijing’s “New Silk Road” wants to use financial power to place China at the heart of Eurasia. So far, Europe has treated these projects as unwelcome competition, and kept its distance.

“Absorb and conquer: An EU approach to Russian and Chinese integration in Eurasia”, a new policy paper from the European Council on Foreign Relations, argues that this is a mistake. Steering clear of these projects could simply push Russia and China closer together – forming a dangerous counterweight to the EU.

Based on extensive interviews with policymakers and business leaders across Eurasia – focusing on Azerbaijan, Greece, Kazakhstan, Serbia, Turkey, and Ukraine – the report sets out how Europe can turn Eurasian integration to its advantage. Though the Russian and Chinese projects are meant to compete with the EU, Europe is playing on its home turf – when it comes to multilateral integration projects, it has more experience than anyone.

Europe should carve out its own role in Central Asia, deepening its relationship with key nations such as Kazakhstan. These countries need the EU’s market, and look to Europe to protect them from Russian – and to a lesser extent Chinese – control. Europe should ensure that no single country controls all energy routes through Eurasia, and back China’s projects in order to reduce Russia’s control over the region. Member states and EU bodies should invest in the New Silk Road, leveraging their money to ensure that the project meets European standards.

Finally, Europe should set up a three-way mechanism for cooperation between the EU, EEU, and the New Silk Road, embracing the competition and drawing Eurasia further into its orbit.

The authors conclude that 'In the end, Eurasian integration remains a distant prospect. The political obstacles to Russia, China, or the EU realising their goals of integrating the region are daunting. Instability, historic rivalries, and corruption haunt both Russia and China – not to mention the competition between them. But progress towards a certain degree of Eurasian integration is both possible and in Europe’s interests'.

There are separate chapters by different authors:
+ Eurasian integration and the EU
+ Azerbaijan: Perspectives on Eurasian integration
+ Greece: Perspectives on Eurasian integration
+ Kazakhstan: Perspectives on Eurasian integration
+ Serbia: Perspectives on Eurasian integration
+ Turkey: Perspectives on Eurasian integration
+ Ukraine: Perspectives on Eurasian integration

Source Link http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR174_Absorb_and_Conquer.pdf
Related Links
ECFR: Publications, June 2016: Absorb and conquer: An EU approach to Russian and Chinese integration in Eurasia http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/absorb_and_conquer_an_eu_approach_to_russian_and_chinese_integration7039
ESO: Background information: Building support for the Belt and Road http://www.europeansources.info/record/building-support-for-the-belt-and-road/
EU: EEAS: China http://eeas.europa.eu/china/index_en.htm
ESO: Key Source: Eurasian Economic Union http://www.europeansources.info/record/eurasian-economic-union/
http://eeas.europa.eu/russia/index_en.htm http://eeas.europa.eu/russia/index_en.htm
ECFR: Essay, 07.06.16: Eurasian integration: Caught between Russia and China http://www.ecfr.eu/article/essay_eurasian
McKinsey and Company, July 2016: ‘One Belt and One Road’: Connecting China and the world http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/infrastructure/our-insights/one-belt-and-one-road-connecting-china-and-the-world

Countries / Regions , , , , , , ,