|Author (Person)||Blockmans, Steven, Emerson, Michael|
|Publisher||Centre for European Policy Studies [CEPS]|
|Series Title||EPIN Working Papers|
|Series Details||No.35, October 2013|
|Publication Date||October 2013|
|Content Type||Journal | Series | Blog|
The first in a series for a CEPS-EPIN project entitled 'The British Question and the Search for a Fresh European Narrative' this paper is pegged on an ambitious ongoing exercise by the British government to review all the competences of the European Union. The intention is that this should provide a basis for informed debate before the referendum on the UK remaining in the EU or not, which is scheduled for 2017.
This paper summarises the first six reviews, each of which runs to around 80 pages, covering foreign policy, development policy, taxation, the single market, food safety, and public health. The present authors then add their own assessments of these materials.
While understandably giving due place to British interests, they are of general European relevance. The substantive conclusions of this first set of reviews are that the competences of the EU are judged by respondents to be ‘about right’ on the whole, which came as a surprise to eurosceptic MPs and the tabloid media. Our own view is that the reviews are objective and impressively researched, and these populist complaints are illustrating the huge gap between the views of informed stakeholders and general public opinion, and therefore also the hazard of subjecting the ‘in or out’ choice for decision by referendum. If the referendum is to endorse the UK’s continuing membership there will have to emerge some fresh popular narratives about the EU. The paper therefore concludes with some thoughts along these lines, both for the UK and the EU as a whole.
From Source URL click on 'Download the document (PDF) for FREE.
|Countries / Regions||United Kingdom|