Case C-723/17 | Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofstedelijk Gewest and Others

Author (Corporate) ,
Publisher
Series Details C-723/17
Publication Date 20
Content Type

Summary:

Advocate General Kokott proposes that the Court of Justice should rule that national courts must, on application by affected individuals, examine whether air sampling points were sited in accordance with the criteria set out in EU law. The limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, PM10, lead, benzene and carbon monoxide are exceeded where an exceedance has been established at one single sampling point.

Source Link http://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?num=C-723/17
Related Link(s)
Official
Advocate General's opinion in Case C-723/17 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62017CC0723
CJEU: Press Release, 28.02.2019: Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-723/17 Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofstedelijk Gewest and Others https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2019-02/cp190021en.pdf

Subject Categories
Subject Tags
Keywords
Countries / Regions
International Organisations