China’s Arctic policy: How China aligns rights and interests

Author (Corporate)
Series Title
Series Details April 2018
Publication Date April 2018
Content Type

Unlike the Arctic states, China has no territorial sovereignty and related sovereign rights to resource extraction and fishing in the Arctic. Faced with very limited rights as a non-Arctic state, China has been eager to design strategies to bridge the widening gap between the legal and institutional constraints in the Arctic and its growing Arctic interests. It has developed a self-defined Arctic identity as a 'near-Arctic state' and sought – and in 2013 gained – observer status in the Arctic Council, to prepare the ground for a future expanded foothold in the region.

China's first-ever white paper on Arctic policy of 26 January 2018 sought to justify the country's Arctic ambitions through its history of Arctic research and the challenges and opportunities that rapid climate change in the Arctic presented the country. China acknowledged for the first time that its Arctic interests were no longer limited to scientific research but extended to a variety of commercial activities. These were embedded in a new China-led cooperation initiative which aimed to build a 'Polar Silk Road' that connected China with Europe via the Arctic and corresponded to one of two new 'blue ocean passages' extending from China's 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, launched in 2013.

The white paper stressed China's commitment to upholding the institutional and legal framework for Arctic governance and to respecting the sovereign rights of the Arctic states. On the other hand, it asserted China's right as a non-Arctic state to participate in Arctic affairs under international law. China's Arctic policy suggested a strong desire to push for the internationalisation of the Arctic's regional governance system. The white paper was not a strategy document, and was more interesting for what it omitted, such as the national security dimension that was a major driver of China's Arctic ambitions.

Author: Gisela Grieger

Source Link http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/620231/EPRS_BRI(2018)620231_EN.pdf
Related Links
Norwegian Institute of International Affairs: NUPI Policy Brief No.44, 2016: Russia and China in Iceland? http://www.europeansources.info/record/russia-and-china-in-iceland/
Chatham House: Expert Comment, 15.10.18: China Expands Its Global Governance Ambitions in the Arctic https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/china-expands-its-global-governance-ambitions-arctic
ECFR: Commentary, 26.10.18: Strategy on ice: Has Russia already won the scramble for the Arctic? https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_strategy_on_ice_has_russia_already_won_the_scramble_for_the_arct

Countries / Regions ,