|Author (Person)||Piirsaar, Marit, Simovart, Mari Ann|
|Series Title||European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review|
|Series Details||Volume 17, Number 3, Pages 144-157|
|Content Type||Journal Article|
Incomplete tenders and missing information seem to be a known constant in public procurement, confronting contracting authorities with legal challenges and critically influencing the results of public purchasing. Faced with a non-conforming tender that cannot be accepted, a contracting authority must choose between two options: to reject the tender or to ask for correction of mistakes in the tender. Exceptionally, instead of the option to clarify, the requirement of proportionality may justify an obligation to do. Subject to a complex discretionary decision, making the choice between a rejection and a clarification has to follow the general principles of EU public procurement law and good administration as well as the national administrative law rules.
This article looks at the topic with the help of examples from Estonian case-law. By analysing both the relevant procedural and substantial rules, we draw guidelines to assist navigating the legal maze of conflicting considerations that concern the correction of mistakes and clarification of ambiguities in public procurement tenders.
|Subject Tags||Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU], EU Law|
|Keywords||CJEU Judgements, Public Procurement
|Countries / Regions||Estonia|
|International Organisations||European Union [EU]|