| Author (Person) | Bianco, Giuseppe |
|---|---|
| Series Title | European Business Law Review |
| Series Details | Vol.26, No.3, 2015, pp. 451–472 |
| Publication Date | 2015 |
| ISSN | 0959-6941 |
| Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
|
Abstract: This article examines the institutional reaction to the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. The response has so far consisted of three new financial mechanisms: the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism, the European Financial Stability Facility, and the European Stability Mechanism. These have each a different legal basis and a specific regime, and display a varying degree of compatibility with EU law. The institutional quick .x employed by Eurozone countries was essentially a resort to private law and traditional international law techniques. Even after the well-known Pringle decision, several doubts still linger on. This framework constitutes a setback from the evolution of the EU, at the expense mainly of the European Parliament and the Court of Justice. |
|
| Source Link | Link to Main Source http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EULR2015023 |
| Subject Categories | Economic and Financial Affairs |
| Countries / Regions | Europe |