European Ombudsman presents 2001 Annual Report, April 2002

Author (Person)
Publisher
Series Title
Series Details 14.04.02
Publication Date 14/04/2002
Content Type , ,

On 8 April the European Ombudsman, Jacob Söderman, presented his 2001 Annual Report to the European Parliament's Committee on Petitions. The report reveals that 2001 was the Ombudsman's busiest so far, with 1874 complaints received - the large majority made against the European Commission.

Mr Söderman took the opportunity to highlight what he considers to be two main achievements made for citizens during 2001: the adoption of new rules on access to documents (Regulation 1049/2001) and of a European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour.

However, he also expressed disappointment at both the Commission's refusal to propose a European administrative law (as requested by Parliament) and at the 'leisurely attitude' of the EU institutions towards implementing the Charter of Fundamental Rights: 'Much to my regret, I have now to state that ... the institutions that proclaimed the Charter have not yet shown themselves to be serious about applying it in practice.'

Background

The European Ombudsman (formally the 'Ombudsman of the European Union') was appointed by the European Parliament in July 1995. His role is to investigate complaints about 'maladministration' by the institutions and bodies of the European Community. Although 'maladministration' is not defined in the Treaty on European Union or in the Statute establishing the post of European Ombudsman, the term is taken to mean poor or failed administration. Examples include:

  • administrative irregularities
  • administrative omissions
  • abuse of power
  • negligence
  • unlawful procedures
  • unfairness
  • malfunction or incompetence
  • discrimination
  • avoidable delay
  • lack or refusal of information

Complaints to the Ombudsman can be made by any citizen of an EU Member State, by anyone living in a Member State, and by businesses, associations or other bodies with a registered office in the EU.

A complaint must be made within two years of the date when the relevant facts were known, and the Community institution or body concerned must have been contacted. A complainant need not be individually affected by the alleged maladministration.

The Ombudsman is not empowered to deal with complaints against international organisations or against national, regional or local authorities in the Member States (even when they are responsible for implementing Community law or policies). Neither can the Ombudsman deal with cases which have been settled by - or are before - the Court of Justice or Court of First Instance.

The Ombudsman's powers of enforcement are limited to ensuring that a 'friendly settlement' is reached between the parties concerned in a complaint; if no agreement can be reached, the Ombudsman is limited to making reports and recommendations. He cannot make a Community institution or body alter a decision or give redress, even if a complaint is found to be justified.

When conducting an inquiry the Ombudsman has wide powers, and must be given access to any information which he requests from the Community institutions or bodies or from Member States (where such information is relevant to alleged maladministration by Community institutions or bodies). Access can be refused only on grounds of secrecy.

In cases where the information requested is not made available, the Ombudsman can enlist the aid of the European Parliament to make 'appropriate representations'.

The 2001 Annual Report

(At the time of writing, the full version of the 2001 Annual Report was not available on the internet; the following is based on press releases and speeches. The Report is expected to be available shortly on the Ombudsman's website).

During 2001 the European Ombudsman received 1874 new complaints (up by 8% over the previous year), making it the busiest year yet since his office opened in September 1995. Of those complaints, 313 were admissible, leading the Ombudsman to open 204 inquiries plus four own-initiative inquiries.

The most common causes of complaints were lack of information or refusal to provide it, avoidable delays, procedural errors, abuse of power, and problems with tenders / contracts concerning the Community institutions.

Complaints received by e-mail continued to increase (34% compared to 24% in 2000), largely due to a new online complaint form being introduced in April 2001.

In 2001 the average length of time taken to complete an inquiry was 289 days (316 days in 2000).

Two special reports were presented to the European Parliament - one concerning sex discrimination in the Commission, the other on access to Council documents.

Table 1: comparisons between 2001, 2000 and 1996 (where available)

   2001  2000  1996 (first full year)
Total cases handled    2017  1041
Total (new) complaints  1874  1732  842
Admissible complaints  313  297  323
Inquiries opened  204 + 4 own initiative  223 + 1 own initiative  207 + 3 own initiative
Backlog (inquiries open for more than 1 year)  22  35  
Target of complaints -      
Commission  77%  83%  
Parliament  7%  7%  
Council  2%  2%  
Source of complaints -      
Individuals  91%  1539  
Companies  5%  76  
Associations  4%  114  
Countries with highest number of complaints      
   Germany 17%  France 16%  UK c18%
   Spain 14%  Germany 13%  Germany c14%
   France 12%  Spain 13%  Spain c11%
Complaints settled by institutions  80  76  12
Critical remarks made by Ombudsman  46  31  
Draft recommendations  13  13  2
Special reports  2  2  
Average time taken to complete an inquiry  289 days  316 days  

Table 2: number of complaints received, by country

   2001  2000
Austria  34  88
Belgium  153  126
Denmark  19  19
Finland  85  76
France  234  279
Germany  323  213
Greece  51  46
Ireland  36  40
Italy  189  193
Luxembourg  33  36
Netherlands  80  52
Portugal  78  58
Spain  259  222
Sweden  56  58
United Kingdom  112  141
Other  132  85
   1874  1732

Presenting the Annual Report to the European Parliament's Committee on Petitions, Mr Söderman stressed that data protection rules are not intended to restrict information available to citizens about public activities, and criticised the institutions' attitudes to openness:

'Their own rules of procedure appear to have a tendency to close rather than to open their activities for the surrounding world and its citizens. There are some indications that especially the Commission, but also the Parliament, intend to use the recently adopted data protection rules to impose more confidentiality on their activities ...'

Mr Söderman also spoke about the Charter of Fundamental Rights proclaimed at the Nice European Council in December 2000. He was critical of the apparent gap between the positive public statements made at the time by Commission President Romano Prodi, Commissioner Vitorino and the President of the European Parliament (at that time Mrs Fontaine) and the 'lukewarm' way in which the Charter is treated within the institutions on a practical basis:

'High officials tell me that the Charter is only a political declaration. I understand from such statements that citizens should not expect political promises to be kept. To me this seems like a way to undermine democracy ... If these institutions do not deliver, the Charter will be a further step on the road of mistrust between the EU and its citizens.'

In the context of the recently-published Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, the Ombudsman also expressed his hope that Parliament 'takes steps to achieve the ultimate goal, which is a modern EU law on good administration based on the existing Code.'

There is an existing agreement between the Ombudsman and Parliament's Committee on Petitions concerning the mutual transfer of complaints and petitions. In his speech on 8 April, Mr Söderman suggested that closer co-operation be established in a number of areas, including a joint information policy.

Contact details

The European Ombudsman
1 avenue du Président Robert Schuman
B.P. 403
F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex
France
Tel: +33 3 88 17 40 01
Fax: +33 3 88 17 90 62
E-mail: euro-ombudsman@europarl.eu.int
Web: www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int

Further information within European Sources Online:

European Sources Online: In Focus
Information and communication in the EU, July 2001
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, April 2001
European Council, Nice, 7-11 December 2000
 
European Sources Online: European Voice:
04.01.01: Commission works to end age bias
18.01.01: Watchdog to probe gag on Commission staff
01.02.01: De Palacio to fight bid to give Ombudsman right to probe Commissioners
08.02.01: Commission misled firm over Metro bid
01.03.01: Watchdog approves payout rules
08.03.01: Ombudsman attacks Commission 'attitude'
15.03.01: Support for ruling against member states' secrecy rules
22.03.01: Environment reports kept secret, says Ombudsman
03.05.01: Söderman demands Council code of conduct
17.05.01: Citizen's watchdog steps up age discrimination battle
31.05.01: Ombudsman attacks Commission 'sexism'
21.06.01: CoR selection process under fresh attack
21.06.01: Söderman wins release of environmental report
21.06.01: Watchdog to probe racism charge against Commission
28.06.01: Council of Ministers' code is 'weakest of all' says watchdog
05.07.01: Watchdog to probe 'bad management' at research centre
26.07.01: Council backs down after four-year fight over access to papers
01.08.01: MEPs set to back extra powers for watchdog
06.09.01: Ombudsman lashes Prodi master plan
04.10.01: Ombudsman raps CoR for second time in four months
11.10.01: Institutions to face probe into 'ageist' hiring
18.10.01: Watchdog's legal chief in line for switch to Brussels
31.10.01: Watchdog takes bite out of parental leave double standards
22.11.01: Watchdog attacks ageist institutions
06.12.01: Watchdog moves on full-time work bias
20.12.01: Watchdog calls for complaints code of practice
10.01.02: Söderman urges MEPs to back Statewatch case
24.01.02: Agency gets a wordy watchdog chastisement for 'gobbledegook'
21.02.02: Söderman calls for urgent action over 'ethnic imbalance'
28.02.02: Competition complaint reignites debate over access to documents
28.02.02: Ombudsman to probe influence of Commission's medical reports
07.03.02: Söderman calls for probe into eurocent furore
14.03.02: Ombudsman boycotts ageist hiring system
28.03.02: Söderman labels EU 'negative' over rights charter
 
European Sources Online: Financial Times
13.03.02: EU criticised for age limit on jobs

Further and subsequent information on the subject of this In Focus can be found by an 'Advanced Search' in European Sources Online by inserting 'ombudsman' in the keyword field.

Further information can be seen in these external links:
(long-term access cannot be guaranteed)

European Ombudsman
Homepage
Ombudsman presents 2001 Annual Report
Speech by the European Ombudsman, Mr Jacob Söderman to the Committee on Petitions concerning the presentation to the European Parliament of his Annual Report for 2001
The European Ombudsman, Annual Reports
The European Ombudsman, Decisions Index
Press releases
12.01.01: Ombudsman may act to ensure that the European Commission respects officials' freedom of expression
25.01.01: Ombudsman calls on the Commission to inquire into the situation of a nuclear submarine in Gibraltar
05.02.01: Complainant's rights violated by the European Commission in Thessaloniki metro case
01.03.01: Ombudsman's late payment success means a brighter future for SMEs
06.03.01: Ombudsman launches inquiry into EU officials' freedom of expression
13.03.01: Ombudsman acts against Council secrecy
20.03.01: Ombudsman asks Commission to grant access to environmental compliance studies
26.03.01: Commission accepts Ombudsman's recommendation in Isle of Wight case
23.04.01: Ombudsman pressures Council to adopt a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour
14.05.01: An end to age discrimination remains top of Ombudsman's agenda
18.05.01: Victory for openness in Parliament recruitment following Ombudsman's intervention
22.05.01: Ombudsman asks Commission to end sex discrimination against seconded national experts
12.06.01: European Commission accepts recommendation from European Ombudsman to release studies on UK and Gibraltar compliance with EC environment law
19.06.01: European Ombudsman to examine complaint about possible racism in recruitment to Community institutions
03.07.01: European Ombudsman questions functioning of Commission Directorate at Ispra
23.07.01: Council agrees to release documents to Statewatch after European Ombudsman intervenes
27.08.01: EIPA press release: EIPA awards Alexis de Tocqueville Prize 2001 to European Ombudsman
06.09.01: Ombudsman attacks Commission for abandoning citizenship
03.10.01: Most EU institutions do not use age limits in recruitment, says European Ombudsman
23.10.01: "The EU should practise what it preaches regarding parental leave" says the European Ombudsman
30.10.01: Ombudsman informs EU citizens of their rights
27.11.01: Ombudsman steps up pressure on Commission over sex discrimination
05.12.01: Ombudsman reports Council for failing to apply rules on openness
12.12.01: Ombudsman welcomes Parliament's resolution as victory for openness
13.12.01: Ombudsman questions Commission decisions on reindeer imports
07.01.02: European Ombudsman Receives Knighthood in France
16.01.02: European Ombudsman questions language used by CEDEFOP
28.01.02: European Ombudsman will continue to monitor Commission on freedom of expression
20.02.02: Ombudsman criticises Commission's passive attitude towards possible racism in recruitment
27.02.02: Ombudsman transfers fur farming complaint to the Commission
28.02.02: Ombudsman transfers complaint about Spanish threat to freedom of movement
04.03.02: Ombudsman transfers euro complaint to Commission
12.03.02: Ombudsman refuses to sign Decision setting up European Recruitment Office
18.03.02: Ombudsman spreads the word on citizens' rights
25.03.02: Ombudsman welcomes CEDEFOP commitment to use proper language
09.04.02: Ombudsman presents 2001 Annual Report

Eric Davies
KnowEurope Researcher
Compiled: 12-14 April 2002

On 8 April the European Ombudsman, Jacob Söderman, presented his 2001 Annual Report to the European Parliament's Committee on Petitions.

Subject Categories