|Author (Person)||Freudlsperger, Christian|
|Publisher||Taylor & Francis|
|Series Title||Journal of European Public Policy|
|Series Details||Volume 25, Number 11, Pages 1686-1705|
|Publication Date||November 2018|
|ISSN||1350-1763 (print) | 1466-4429 (online)|
|Content Type||Journal Article|
Comparative federalism contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between ‘Brussels’ and member states in international trade policy.
Analysing the under-studied field of international procurement liberalization and comparing the European Union (EU), the United States (US) and Canada, the article observes that sub-federal resistance has differed across federations. It finds that the more ‘voice’ sub-federal executives enjoy, the less they ‘exit’ from international commitments. Voice hinges on their representation in federation-wide decision-making (council or senate) and the sectoral nature of vertical relations (collaborative or competitive).
In the US senate federation, effective means of joint policy-making have not evolved in this non-coercive field, inciting states to exit. In Canada, increasing collaboration has compensated provinces for senate federalism’s low voice, reducing their resistance. EU ‘second chamber federalism’ proves peculiar for constituent units’ decisive role and its dense and trusting regime of collaboration. Member states’ high voice has encouraged their low resistance.trade
|Subject Tags||Trade Policy|
|Countries / Regions||Canada, United States|
|International Organisations||European Union [EU]|