|Author (Person)||Adriaensen, Johan, Colli, Francisca, Coremans, Evelyn, Kerremans, Bart|
|Author (Corporate)||European Parliament: DG External Policies|
|Publisher||European Parliament: European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS)|
|Series Details||PE 603.477|
|Publication Date||March 2019|
|Content Type||Research Paper|
The Lisbon Treaty increased the European Parliament’s powers over EU trade policy. Ten years after its entry into force it is timely to take stock of how the EP has made use of this leverage in shaping the EU’s trade negotiations. Such an exercise benefits from a comparison with other well-established parliamentary democracies, particularly the key partners with whom the EU has recently negotiated or has started to negotiate a comprehensive trade agreement.
This study compares parliamentary scrutiny of trade policy in the EU with the United States, Canada and Australia. It concludes that the European Parliament has become powerful and active in trade policy, on a comparable level to the US Congress. Its powers exceed those of other Western democracies, such as Australia and Canada. From the latter the European Parliament may conclude that it is important to codify some of its informal oversight practices, before they may get lost over time again. This may also help to encourage its trading partners to increase their parliamentary involvement during negotiations with the EU. As regards the implementation of trade agreements however, the EU has very few competences in comparison to all other three countries analysed.
|Subject Tags||External Trade | Trade Agreements, Trade Policy|
|Countries / Regions||Australia, Canada, United States|
|International Organisations||European Union [EU]|