Press Release: Judgment in Joined Cases C-443/14 and C-444/14 Kreis Warendorf v Ibrahim Alo and Amira Osso v Region Hannover

The Court of Justice gave as a ruling on the relationship between the freedom of movement of beneficiaries of international protection and measures intended to facilitate their integration.

A place-of-residence condition may be imposed on beneficiaries of subsidiary protection if they face greater integration difficulties than other non-EU citizens who are legally resident in the Member State that has granted such protection

EUObserver, 01.03.16: EU court backs refugees' free movement, in most cases https://euobserver.com/migration/132518

The Local.de, 01.03.16: Germany can force refugees to stay put, EU court rules http://www.thelocal.de/20160301/germany-can-force-refugees-to-stay-put-eu-court-rules

Blog: EU Law Analysis, 09.03.16: Enhancing and diluting the legal status of subsidiary protection beneficiaries under Union law – the CJEU judgment in Alo and Osso http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/enhancing-and-diluting-legal-status-of.html

ESO: Background information: Advocate General’s Opinion in Joint Cases C-443/14. Kreis Warendorf v Ibrahim Alo et C-444/14 Amira Osso v Region Hanover http://www.europeansources.info/record/press-release-advocate-generals-opinion-in-joint-cases-c-443-14-kreis-warendorf-v-ibrahim-alo-et-c-444-14-amira-osso-v-region-hanover/

---