|Author (Person)||Carbone, Maurizio|
|Publisher||Taylor & Francis|
|Series Title||The International Spectator|
|Series Details||Volume 54, Number 1, Pages 45-59|
|Publication Date||March 2019|
|Content Type||Journal Article|
The EU’s proposal to renew the EU-ACP Agreement in spite of a number of signals pointing in the opposite direction is, inter alia, the unintended consequence of independent decisions taken in three different policy areas (trade, environment, and foreign and security affairs). The common unintended consequence that the three decisions shared would not have materialised if the European Commission had not purposefully triggered it to justify its vision of future EU-ACP relations.
These findings challenge the prevailing and superficial usage of the notion of the unintended as a synonym for unanticipated and undesirable, and demonstrate that unintended consequences do not necessarily presuppose lack of anticipation, but may well be the result of calculation by policymakers.
|Subject Categories||Politics and International Relations, Trade|
|Subject Tags||Bilateral Relations, External Trade | Trade Agreements|
|Keywords||Economic Partnership Agreement [EPA]
|International Organisations||African Caribbean and Pacific Group of States [ACP], European Union [EU]|