R. (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union: thriller or vanilla?

Author (Person)
Series Title
Series Details Vol.42, No.2, April 2017, p280-295
Publication Date April 2017
ISSN 0307-5400
Content Type

This article commented on the UK Supreme Court decision of January 2017 on the legality of triggering art.50. It set out the background to the decision and explained and evaluated the differences between the majority and the minority. It argued that the decision, in one sense, did not live up to the expectations generated by its publicity. It drew on longstanding principles of UK constitutional law and its outcome appeared unlikely to delay or condition the exercise of art.50.

Nevertheless, the majority focused on the constitutional impact of joining the EU and reinforced both that it was for UK law to determine the relationship between UK law and EU law, and that constitutional principles of the UK may limit the transfer of sovereignty from the UK to the EU. These elements may have more long-term consequences for EU law.

Source Link http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/
Related Link(s)
Sweet and Maxwell: European Law Review http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/catalogue/productdetails.aspx?recordid=427&productid=6968
ESO: Background information: Article 50 'Brexit' Appeal. R (on the application of Miller and Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union and associated references, 5-8 December 2016. Ruling, 24 January 2017 http://www.europeansources.info/record/article-50-brexit-appeal-r-on-the-application-of-miller-and-dos-santos-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union-and-associated-references-5-8-december-2016-ruling-24-january-2017/
UCL: The Constitution Unit: Blog, 21.08.18: The executive’s Brexit: the UK Constitution after Miller https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/21/the-executives-brexit-the-uk-constitution-after-miller/

Subject Categories
Countries / Regions ,