| Author (Person) | Stiegler, Thomas |
|---|---|
| Publisher | College of Europe |
| Series Title | EU Diplomacy Papers |
| Series Details | No. 1, January 2013 |
| Publication Date | January 2013 |
| Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
|
Why does the European Union (EU) join international human rights treaties? This paper develops motivational profiles pertaining either to a ‘logic of appropriateness’ or a ‘logic of consequentialism’ in order to answer this question. It compares the EU’s motivations for its recent accession to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) with those dominating the EU’s nonaccession to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention). Based on this cross-case analysis, I argue that the EU’s accession decisions are best viewed as cost-benefit calculations and explained by the strength of opposition and the desire to spread its norms. The EU is only marginally concerned with efforts to construct an ‘appropriate role’, although its accession considerations are positively influenced by (varying degrees) of an internalized commitment to human rights. The paper aims at deepening the understanding of the EU’s motivations in the paradigmatic hard case of accession to international human rights treaties not least to evaluate the EU’s ‘exceptional nature’, facilitate its predictability for stake-holders and contribute to political and ethical debates surrounding future rites of passage as a global actor. |
|
| Source Link | https://www.coleurope.eu/system/files_force/research-paper/edp_1-2013_stiegler_0.pdf |
| Related Links |
|
| Subject Categories | Politics and International Relations, Values and Beliefs |
| Countries / Regions | Europe |
