|Author (Person)||Rasmussen, Hjalte|
|Publisher||Sweet & Maxwell|
|Series Title||European Law Review|
|Series Details||Volume 40, Number 4, Pages 475-489|
|Publication Date||August 2015|
|Content Type||Journal Article|
This article focuses on that part of the European Court’s CILFIT Judgment which deals with the exceptions to national last-resort courts’ obligation under Article 177(3) to submit preliminary questions to the European Court.
The thesis of this article is that CILFIT, in this respect, means something entirely different from what the Judgment decides on the face of it. The sole subject of the article is to prove that contention.
|Subject Tags||EU Law, National Law | Legal Systems|
|International Organisations||European Union [EU]|