| Author (Person) | Roger, Léa |
|---|---|
| Series Title | European Union Politics |
| Series Details | Vol.18, No.4, December 2017, p560–580 |
| Publication Date | December 2017 |
| ISSN | 1465-1165 |
| Content Type | Journal | Series | Blog |
|
Abstract: The left–right line of conflict has been the dominant dimension of decision-making in the European Parliament since 1979. A pro-/anti-European Union integration dimension is of secondary importance. Limited evidence exists on the conditions under which these different dimensions matter. This study examines parliamentary decision-making about the so-called Two-Pack, which moved responsibilities about budgetary decision-making to the European Commission. The article uses in-depth interviews, textual analysis of committee debates and roll call voting analysis in order to determine which lines of conflict matter at which stage of decision-making. The evidence indicates that left–right division is dominant in the informal stage preceding committee debates, while both the pro-/anti-European Union and the left/right dimensions matter during the committee stage, whereas for plenary votes, the pro-/anti-European Union dimension is crucial. |
|
| Source Link | Link to Main Source http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116517716311 |
| Related Links |
|
| Subject Categories | Politics and International Relations |
| Countries / Regions | Europe |