Thinking about Intelligence Within, Without, and Beyond the State

All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace

All Azimuth, journal of the İhsan Doğramacı Peace Foundation’s Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research at Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey. It provides a forum for academic studies on foreign policy analysis and peace research as well as theoretically-oriented policy pieces on international issues.

It particularly welcomes research on the nexus of peace, security and development. It aims to publish pieces bridging the theory-practice gap; dealing with under-represented conceptual approaches in the field; and making scholarly engagements for the dialogue between the 'centre' and the 'periphery'. We strongly encourage, therefore, publications with homegrown theoretical and philosophical approaches. In this sense, All Azimuth aims to transcend the conventional theoretical, methodological, geographical, academic and cultural boundaries. All Azimuth is published two times a year by the Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research.The reform or ‘democratization’ of intelligence has been studied in many countries essentially as a process of transition from authoritarian or ‘counterintelligence’ states to liberal democratic regimes in which security and intelligence agencies are subject to (more or less) democratic control and oversight. These studies have contributed to the growth in comparative studies of intelligence but have often ignored some key issues, including the conditions for the very existence of ‘state’ intelligence, the continuing significance of parallel non-state intelligence entities and the involvement of an increasing number of corporate actors in intelligence activities.

This chapter examines intelligence as it works within and between different ‘sectors’ and the implications for democratization. Intelligence is a sub-set of ‘surveillance’, a ubiquitous social activity, and can be defined as: ‘mainly secret activities – targeting, collection, analysis, dissemination and action – intended to enhance security and/or maintain power relative to competitors by forewarning of threats and opportunities.’ A central element of this definition – as with surveillance more generally - is the link between information/knowledge and action/power (or, ‘intelligence’ and ‘policy’) where the objective of the process is security and it will be subject to resistance. Intelligence is exercised at various social ‘levels’ from the transnational to the personal: even individuals deploy information gathering in the face of uncertainty in order to assess threats etc.

• Primary Source

All Azimuth: Past Issues http://www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org/index.php/en/past-issues/

---