Transparency and Process: Do We Need a New Mandate for the Hearing Officer?

Author (Corporate)
Publisher
Series Title
Series Details Volume 6, Number 2, Pages 475-489
Publication Date May 2010
ISSN 1744-1056
Content Type

Introduction:

"The Lisbon Treaty, with the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, puts the spotlight on the issues of due process and fairness in the Commission’s antitrust procedures."
"A key mechanism for achieving procedural equality and accountability is the Hearing Officer."
"With this article, we point out the main areas where updates and amendments to the role of the Hearing Officers are required if the Hearing Officers are indeed to constitute “independent guardians” of procedural rights. Strengthening the role of the Hearing Officers is a way of strengthening due process and fairness of the Commission’s process in general—without a need to undertake “any radical changes”. Our conclusion is that in order to achieve that goal the Hearing Officers need a new Mandate; a Mandate that properly reflects the function of the Office by entrusting the Hearing Officers with responsibility and real powers (Section B), ensuring the impartiality and independence of the Hearing Officers and transparency of their actions (Section C), and making the Oral Hearing a meaningful fact-finding exercise (Section D)."
Source Link https://doi.org/10.5235/174410510792283772
Subject Categories
Subject Tags
Keywords