|Author (Person)||Meyer, Christoph O., Zdrada, Adrian|
|Publisher||Taylor & Francis|
|Series Title||European Security|
|Series Details||Volume 15, Number 1, Pages 23-45|
|Publication Date||March 2006|
|Content Type||Journal Article|
The study focuses on collective norms concerning the use of force to inform the analysis of national and European security and defence policy. In particular, it aims to shed some light on the question of why members of the US-led ‘coalition of the willing’ in Iraq subsequently supported further steps towards an autonomous and effective European Security and Defence Policy.
We analyse collective defence norms in Britain and Poland by means of a qualitative analysis of press debates before, during and after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Our findings indicate that the salience and vigour of the debates varied strongly and so did the areas of normative contention. In the British press, debates centred on normative conflicts surrounding the relationship with the US, international authorisation, and the legitimacy of regime change as a goal for the use of force. In Poland, debates were far less intense and centred on the need to show solidarity with a trusted ally in need.
We conclude that strategic norms, in particular revolving around the attachment to the US as a security partner, have become less of a problem for the evolution of ESDP but for different reasons in each case.
|Subject Categories||Security and Defence|
|Subject Tags||Wars | Conflicts|
|Keywords||Public Communication | Narratives
|Countries / Regions||Poland, United Kingdom|