US imposes steel import tariffs, March 2002

Author (Person)
Publisher
Series Title
Series Details 7.3.02
Publication Date 07/03/2002
Content Type , ,

While the 'war on terrorism' has led to increasing co-operation between the European Union and the United States since 11 September 2001 a new 'war on trade' is brewing following President Bush's decision on 5 March 2002 to impose tariffs on US steel imports, which threatens to seriously weaken the transatlantic relationship.

Following President Bush's decision to impose 30% tariffs on steel imports Pascal Lamy, the EU Commissioner for Trade, said the EU deplored the decision and added,

'The EU is the principal victim of these measures because it represents more than 25% of American imports of flat and tin mill products, on which 30% tariffs will be applied...[It] has been hit by these unjust and unfounded measures [and it] intends to respond in full respect of international rules. The world steel market is not the Wild West where everyone can do as it pleases'
European Commission: Press Release: IP/02/379

The EU immediately filed complaints with the WTO and demanded compensation for the €2.5 billion it expects to lose per year as a result of the US tariffs.

Background

The potential for an EU-US trade war over steel became apparent in June 2001 soon after a resolution had been reached in another important trade issue between the two powers over bananas.

On 8 June 2001 President Bush asked the US International Trade Commission to investigate whether restrictions on steel imports were needed to improve the fortunes of the failing US steel industry, after vociferous lobbying from the US steel industry.

The industry has been suffering in recent years with a number of steel plant closures. US steelmakers blame the increase in the number of imports into their country for this crisis. Indeed, imports into the US did increase by 10 million tons to 41.5 million tons in 1998 following the 1997 Asian financial crisis but they fell again in 1999 to 35.7million and 38m tons in 2001. However these figures are still above the annual figures of 15m-30m tons registered early in the 1990s.

The US steel industry claims that this increase in the number of imports has affected the price of steel in the US which in turn has sparked a series of bankruptcies in US steel companies. However there has been a general trend towards more exporting in the industry generally with estimates that about 40% of the 810m tons of steel made in 2001 traded across a national border, up from less than 25% in the 1970s.

Critics worldwide claim that the US steel industry is suffering not because of imports but because it has not done enough to restructure itself and to face the challenges of the late 1990s. A European industry analyst argues that,

'The US steel industry has not restructured to strengthen its financial position and make itself more competitive. It has the protectionist tendencies reminiscent of French farmers'.

In Europe several steel companies have been forced to restructure in order to remain competitive. Arbed of Luxembourg and Usinor of France sought to merge in 2001 and UK-based Corus - the result of a 1999 combination of British Steel and Hoogovens of the Netherlands - announced in February 2001 that it would cut its UK steelmaking capacity by 20%, shedding some 10,000 jobs.

Tariffs for protection

With the US steel industry still shying away from such restructuring and figures showing that the industry had lost $1.4 billion in the first half of 2001, the US International Trade Commission put forward several recommendations on 7 December 2001. In essence, these suggested that President Bush should impose up to 40% tariffs on steel imports for up to four years allowing the steel industry time to restructure itself.

In the light of the USITC's proposals President Bush announced on 5 March 2002 that 30% tariffs would be imposed on certain steel imports. Although the tariffs fall short of the USITC's proposals in that they are only 30% and will only apply for three years rather than the recommended four they have still provoked much reaction both in the United States and abroad. Estimates suggest that the measures will cost foreign steel producers more than $9 billion a year in lost revenues and the tariffs represent the most severe trade restrictions since the mid-1980s, when the US forced Europe and Japan to restrict steel exports to the US or face punishing quotas.

Domestic Politics

In the United States the measures have been welcomed by the US steel industry. The American Iron and Steel Institute 'applauded the courageous decision in the national interest' by President Bush and said,

'This will give the industry a much needed breathing space to begin to recover from the worst crisis in the history of the American steel industry.

This decision will be critical in helping to return the American steel industry to a position of health. It shows that the President wants to address and reverse the damage to U.S. steel companies, employees and communities. It shows also that the President understands that a strong domestic steel industry is essential to the long-term interest of U.S. steel-using industries, the U.S. economy and U.S. national security'.

Many believe that President Bush really had no choice but to impose the tariffs after promising to help the steel industry in his election campaign in 2001. Such promises are believed to have helped him win the election after winning two states Ohio and West Virginia, where the steel industry has a large presence. With elections in November 2002 for the House of Representatives and the next Presidential election in 2004 many see the steel issue as key in determining the fortunes of the Republicans and President Bush himself.

However, while the steel industry has welcomed the tariffs other sectors in the United States have criticised the move. The International Herald Tribune reported that Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board had complained to the Bush Administration over the steel tariffs saying that the United States had benefited 'more than anybody' from international free trade. Many in the United States also fear that US consumers will suffer from the effects of the tariffs as products using steel, including cars, may increase in price.

International Politics

Around the world there was also severe criticism of President's Bush's decision with all the key steel making countries lodging complaints at the World Trade Organisation.

The European Union, in its response, highlighted the need to find a multilateral solution to the problems hitting the global steel industry. It cited the high level group of the OECD which had been set up to tackle steel issues and was due to report on them at the end of March 2002. It also noted the efforts it had made to avoid such tariffs. Pascal Lamy had suggested to Robert Zoellick that a fund should be created to aid US restructuring and Romano Prodi wrote to President Bush in a last ditch effort to persuade the US not to impose import tariffs.

With all of this to no avail the EU is now facing a serious hardship for its own steel industry because of the US measures. Not only is it concerned about the loss to the industry caused by the decrease in exports to the US which it estimates could be up to 4 million tonnes, it also fears that 16 million tonnes of steel from elsewhere will find its way to the EU because it can't get into the US market. As the EU noted, the US is asking the rest of the world to meet the costs of its own industry's problems.

Business organisations within the EU have also criticised the tariffs. Eurofer, the European Confederation of Iron and Steel industries, condemned the decision of President Bush saying,

'It is unfair, unwarranted, and likely to be counterproductive. The decision appears to place a particularly heavy burden on EU exports, yet the record amply demonstrates that the EU exports did not contribute to any injury the US producers might have suffered'.

UNICE, the pan-European employers organisation, joined Eurofer in its criticism of the tariffs. Its secretary general, Phillipe de Buck, said,

'I regret that the President has given in to internal protectionist pressures for domestic political reasons without taking due account of the implications of his decision for relations with the country's partners'.

UNICE also highlighted the impact of the decision on EU-US trade relations saying,

'It exacerbates tensions with the United States' main trading partners, with the risk of a trade war which will be paid for by companies. At transatlantic level, it creates new tensions in relations between the United States and the European Union, already disrupted by difficult and politically sensitive disputes. It may render even more difficult transatlantic cooperation on multilateral issues, indispensable to push work in Geneva forward on the Doha Development Agenda'.

The Future of EU-US Relations

The EU will now have to see how the World Trade Organisations views the tariffs. While the Appellate Body has already condemned the US move, a bilateral consultation phase will be set up. If this does not reach agreement within 60 days then a WTO dispute panel will be convened with the prospect of panel negotiations lasting more than a year.

If the EU were not to be supported by the WTO, although it is convinced it has a strong legal case, and if it does not receive compensation from the US, then it has already said it would be prepared to take retaliatory actions by blocking US goods.

Clearly, the decision on steel import tariffs has added further strain to EU-US trade relations.

There are already current disputes over a provision in US tax law which is in effect a subsidy for exports and another on Europe's ban on imports of beef treated with growth promoting hormones. While the two sides might be co-operating on the 'war on terrorism' they appear to be increasingly battling each other in the 'war on trade'

Further information within European Sources Online:

European Sources Online: Topic Guides
The European Union and the United States
The external trade policy of the European Union
European Sources Online: European Voice
25.10.01: The EU will take Washington to the World Trade Organisation if the US blocks European steel exports, a Commission spokesman said
07.03.02: Trade chief vows stainless response to US steel tariffs
07.03.02: New showdown puts tense transatlantic ties to test
07.03.02: Bush's "anvil of evil" hammers Europe
 
European Sources Online: Financial Times
08.06.01: Bush seeks steel sector friends
12.06.01: Structural weakness strains steel industry
14.06.01: Summit steels itself for a bumpy ride
20.06.01: America is playing fair
07.07.01: EU issues steel duty deadline
09.07.01: US urges global deal to tackle steel surplus
20.07.01: Talks fail to solve steel trade dispute
25.07.01: New blow for US steel industry
17.09.01: Steelmakers critical of aid
26.11.01: Washington steels itself for big push to cut imports
05.12.01: US steel begins talks on restructuring sector
08.12.01: Bush advised to impose tariffs on steel imports
14.12.01: Lamy delivers strong rebuff to US plan on steel tariffs
17.12.01: Steelmakers in talks on how to reduce output
17.12.01: A lot to hammer out
18.12.01: Brussels has wrong view on reshape of US steel
19.12.01: Steelmakers on collision course over cuts
20.12.01: Cuts deal fails to end steel's war of words
07.02.02: World's big steel producers ready for hard talking
08.02.02: Tax use of steel to cut your costs EU tells US
09.02.02: Steel trade war may yet be averted
22.02.02: EU ready for swift action if US imposes curbs on steel
25.02.02: A steel trap
04.03.02: EU set to retaliate if US imposes steel tariffs[FT.com]
06.03.02: Trade war looms as US puts tariff on steel imports[FT.com]
06.03.02: Corus fears US action on steel imports[FT.com]
06.03.02: Bush move marks US trade policy turning point[FT.com]
07.03.02: EU hits at 'wild west' steel tariffs[FT.com]
07.03.02: Blair condemns Bush's tariffs on steel imports[FT.com]
07.03.02: World united to condemn US decision to impose 30% tariffs[FT.com]
07.03.02: Republicans sacrifice free trade rhetoric to bat for US workers[FT.com]
07.03.02: Steel groups ponder effects of US tariffs[FT.com]
07.03.02: Cold steel: Foreign capitals have limited scope to retaliate against US tariffs[FT.com]
08.03.02: ECB chief hits at steel tariffs[FT.com]

Further information can be seen in these external links:
(long-term access cannot be guaranteed)

EU Institutions

European Commission
Press Releases
06.06.01: EU very disappointed at US decision to launch investigation that could lead to protectionist measures to shelter US steel industry [IP/01/1797]
23.10.01: EU confirms imports not to blame for US steel industry woes as US International Trade Commission announces investigation findings [IP/01/1478]
10.12.01: EU forcefully condemns US International Trade Commission's recommendation to virtually close US steel market to imports from rest of world [IP/01/1784]
14.12.01: EU ready to take all necessary steps to keep foreign markets open to European steel and to prevent flood of imports into EU if US goes down blatantly protectionist road [IP/01/1831]
19.02.02: EU welcomes clear WTO decision on US safeguard on line pipe: clear implications for upcoming steel decision [IP/02/275]
06.03.02: Statement by EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy in reaction to US Measures on Steel [IP/02/379]
06.03.02: EU responds firmly to US decision to severely restrict steel imports from rest of world [IP/02/367]
Speeches
13.12.01: UK Steel Association Annual Forum [SPEECH/01/631]
 
European Commission: DG Trade
Steel Sector: Index
Bilateral trade relations with United States
 
European Commission: DG External Relations
The EU's relations with the United States of America
EU-US News: A Review of Transatlantic Relations
 
European Central Bank
07.03.02: Speech by Wim Duisenberg at ECB press conference
 
International Organisations
 
OECD
Homepage
Science, Technology and Industry: Steel Industry
18.09.01: High-level Meeting on Steel Issues, Paris, 17-18 September 2001 - Conclusions
18.12.01: High-Level Meeting on Steel, 17-18 December 2001- Conclusions
08.02.02: High-Level Meeting on Steel, Paris, 7-8 February 2002 - Conclusions
06.03.02: OECD Deputy Secretary-General Calls for Continued Dialogue on Steel
 
World Trade Organisation
Homepage
07.03.02: WTO rules serve full membership, says Director-General
Iron and steel imports of the European Union and the United States by region and supplier, 2000
 
National Organisations
 
United Kingdom: 10 Downing St.
Homepage
08.03.02: PM article - Steel tariffs
 
United Kingdom: Department of Trade and Industry
Homepage
06.03.02: Statement to the House of Commons - US tariffs on imports of steel
 
United States of America: The White House
Homepage
News and Policies: Steel
05.03.02: President announces temporary safeguards for steel industry
05.03.02: Press Briefing by U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick
05.03.02: Steel products proclamation
05.03.02: Factsheet: Regarding the Presidential Action on Steel
05.03.02: Components of the President's decision
United States: United States International Trade Commission
Homepage
Steel Global Safeguard Investigation
 
The United States Mission to the EU
Homepage
Dossier: Steel
Press Releases
27.02.02: President Bush comes under domestic pressure on steel
28.02.02: Senator Specter says Bush will act on steel dumping
28.02.02: Daschle urges Bush to support 4 year 40% steel tariff
05.03.02: US steel industry facts
05.03.02: White House Q&A on steel decision
05.03.02: White House explains steel import relief decision
05.03.02: USTR's Zoellick says steel tariffs a safeguard step
05.03.02: President Bush imposes safeguards on steel imports
06.03.02: Congressional steel caucus chairman hails steel tariff
06.03.02: US officials defend temporary relief for steel industry

Miscellaneous Organisations

EUROFER
Homepage
05.03.02: Steel safeguard measures in the US: Eurofer condemns President Bush's decision
 
The UK Steel Association
Homepage
Press Releases:
07.04.01: UK steel industry blasts threat of US import restrictions
19.06.01: President Bush's steel trade initiative
23.10.01: UK steel industry slams injury vote in the US
06.03.02: UK steel industry reacts to US import tariffs
Parliamentary Briefing:
  Steel trade threat may have severe consequences for UK steel markets and jobs [November 2001]
 
American Iron and Steel Institute
Homepage
  Jobs at Risk: The Necessity of Effective Relief for the American Steel Industry [February 2002]
  President Bush's report submitted to the United States Congress
05.03.02: Steel industry applauds courageous decision by Bush
06.03.02: AISI praises tireless efforts of the steel caucuses and steel-state governors
Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederations (UNICE)
Homepage
06.03.02: Press Release: Steel: President Bush's decision highly regrettable
 
News Organisations
 
The International Herald Tribune Online
06.03.02: Bush sets steep levies on foreign steelmakers
06.03.02: US tariffs draw fire from Asia to Europe
07.03.02: What about free trade?
07.03.02: 'Foremost victim' assails U.S. tariffs
08.03.02: In imposing US steel tariffs, U.S. hits allies hardest
08.03.02: Bush plays politics with trade
 
The Washington Post
07.03.02: Bending for steel
07.03.02: Reaction abroad on steel is harsh
07.03.02: Steeled for the worst
08.03.02: EU challenges US steel tariffs at WTO
08.03.02: So much for free trade
 
BBC Online
01.03.02: US steel workers stage mass protest
04.03.02: Steel trade war looms
06.03.02: Steel producers attack US tariff
05.03.02: Q&A: World steel dispute
06.03.02: Analysis: Politics of steel
06.03.02: Steel spat could mean wider worries
06.03.02: Trade war looms over steel dispute
06.03.02: Steel row tests UK-US friendship
06.03.02: South Africa cheers US steel tariff
06.03.02: Steel sector stares into the abyss
06.03.02: Blair says US steel move 'wrong'
06.03.02: EU plans 'urgent' retaliation in steel row
07.03.02: EU hits back against US steel duties
08.03.02: US finance chief backs steel moves

Further and subsequent information on the subject of this In Focus can be found by an 'Advanced Search' in European Sources Online by inserting 'steel' in the keyword field.

Helen Bower
Compiled: 7 March 2002

A new trade war between the EU and US is brewing following President Bush's decision on 5 March 2002 to impose tariffs on US steel imports.

Subject Categories
Countries / Regions