|Author (Person)||Polese, Abel|
|Series Title||Journal of Contemporary European Studies|
|Series Details||Vol.22, No.2, June 2014, p184-198|
|Publication Date||June 2014|
|Content Type||Journal | Series | Blog|
Since the end of socialism scholars have been debating whether post-socialist welfare policies in Eastern Europe and the former USSR could be considered converging into Western European patterns, and possibly fit one of Esping-Andersen's (1990) welfare state classifications, or whether they should be considered an exception or sui generis and therefore studied beyond these categories. This article is informed by post-2008 crisis material and contends that neither of the above interpretative frameworks is appropriate because they both miss the role of informal welfare provision and informal renegotiations of the scope of welfare policies.
Going beyond the transitional-alternative paradigm, this article situates itself in the structure–agency debate in defining how welfare policies are renegotiated by domestic and local actors and come to form a partially new system. Rather than seeing the former socialist region as an exception, it suggests that the very debate about the welfare state and welfare policies should be revisited in order to consider also informality as a major element of social policy-making.
|Subject Categories||Employment and Social Affairs|
|Countries / Regions||Central Europe, Lithuania, Romania|